Loading...
07-19-2001 Regular MeetingJuly 19, 2001 The regular scheduled meeting of the Urban Design Commission (UDC) was held on July 19, 2001. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Max Bacon at 7:00 pm. Those in attendance were members of the UDC, representatives from the Village Market Development Team, concerned residents and City Staff (see attached sign -in list). The only order of business was an Application for Certificate of Approval from the UDC for the Village Market. Mayor Bacon made opening remarks related to the overall nature of the mixed used development being considered for approval. Mayor Bacon indicated the plan was the result of a collaborate effort of elected officials, the DDA Task Force, residents and Staff. G.K. Johnson made a brief presentation on behalf of the development team. According to Mr. Johnson, the key to the success of the mixed -use development is the creation of a project with a high occupancy rate and retail traffic. To achieve these goals, the proposed development includes attractive buildings with a defined entry point and sense of place. Mr. Johnson also stressed the development would be pedestrian -friendly. Some components of the project detailed by Mr. Johnson included: 1" floor retail with front -door deliveries, provision for the maintenance of public right-of-ways, outdoor vendor spaces, signage control and attractive landscaping. Mr. Johnson stated the plans as presented are consistent with the Urban Design Guidelines with the exception of thirteen modifications (see attached). Approval was requested by Mr. Johnson of the development with the thirteen modifications. In response to the thirteen modifications, G.K. indicated the requested roof pitch of 3:12 should have read 6:12. He stated he would check with the architect and determine correct roof pitch before the August 6, 2001 Council Meeting. Mr. Johnson also indicated the type of roof shingle used would be high -quality and similar to the ones used by Wieland Homes at Old Ivy Development. Without further comment, the development was unanimously recommended for approval.