Loading...
June 29, 1983 Council Meeting " ~---~""-"-"~---"--- met June 29, 1983 at City Hall for the purpose of a called to order at 5:30 p.m. by presiding officer members were present except Jack Shinall who was ttorney Charles Camp, C:ity Clerk willouise Spivey, nd City Marshal Gene Golden. of Section 901 of the Ordinance concerning the require- he had notified the 13 businesses scheduled to appear y were in violation, with no response. did not receive the letter from Mr. Golden. who is renting the building from her. Mrs. violation and did not know what she was sup- sa:id she was not financially able at this time m Hawkins sa:id it should be up to the tenant of improvements and asked Mrs. Fowler to check the lease Jim Mr. code. a motion that e us to Jim Tolleson seconded be g:iven 30 days to will be taken to bring carried 6-0. file the an answer wi th property up to Davis said told him not the purpose was that some of the purpose of the ordinance comply. Attorney Camp of' tires and cause person is no excus was $ 3,000 and thi Hawk ade a moti seco by Jim To tonight as to when knew they in the motion see these improvements Dav:is be g:iven to June carried 5-1, with J~es ad den' s letter of March II th, but a city official that nothing would be done. Mr. Davis asked what ce requiring paved pat' king . He had been told would grandfathered. and if beautificatibn was the we were de1"eating our own purpose by not making everyone hat one reason was that gravel could stick in the tread on the city streets. Also, noncompliance by one Davis said the cheapest esbimate he receiv~d cause a serious problem with his budget. Jim Davis ,also be given 30 days to 1"ile a pLan 'of action, said he fel t we needed a definite commitment could be made because these people alreadY have made no response. After further discussion, Mr. Davis said he could not possibly complet~ the next year. Jim Hawkins then made a motion that Mr. to comply. Elbert Coalson seconded the motion which opposed. it was to have the parking paved. he bought it contingente upon the a gravel parking area would put the P?lrking area in. Mr. area to the back and be moved. Jim Hawkins asked and Mr.1 Davies said he did not know now. He would have days he would be more prepared to give a specific de a motion that Mr. Davies be given two weeks ~f action to bring his property up to code. Max ed 6-0. ttorne d his prop t was approve area son said at see how we could come back 5 time, the ing inspector was mentioned Stinson be given 30 days 0 to do to corect the problem. Jim rd Road rezoned before he purchased it, but when the zoning ~lat of the property showing ,the proposed parking the City ws totally satisfied ,and he did not years later and tell him he was in violation. At that m,everything was in comp1iance and a paved parking ther discussion, Jim Hawkins made a motion that file'an answer with Mr. G01den as to what ,he intends Tolleson seconded the motion which carried 6-0. 1286 Concord Road property owner, stated this property was zoned between 1970 and 1972 he lived t It was originally zoned for a real estate off'ice. this ld not be grandfathered as f'ar as the parking operty has changed from the zoning and a flower lowed in Idmited Commercial zoning. Jim Hawkins en 30 days to file a plan of action with Mr. "f .. Jim Tolleson amended the motion to state that Mr. Caswell be required to rezoning to a category compatible with the flower shop. Max Bacon seconded ent. Vote on the amendment and main motion carried 6-0. 1216 Concord Road res of his property and stated he had already begun work in n's letter to correct the violations. He planned to regrass have parking on the side of the house and repairs in the back. motion that 'Mr. Hiatt be given 6 months to comply. Sarah Jones which carried 6-0. Com an Concord Road his prop oned in 1982 and he was still in the process of making Section 1305 of the ordinance states that a bui shall be or a 2 year period and Mr. Boling said he would wait for time limit; to before pav:ing the lot, which cost more than he could afford to spend now. Attorney Camp said the permit was good for 2 years as long as it was still under construction, but that would not apply in this case since lready occupying the buildJ..ng. Mr. Boling said he intended to make the s, but could not handle it financially at this time. Jim Hawkins made hat Mr. Boling to June 1, 1984 to comply with the ordinance. Elbert seconded the mot carried 6-0. ssociates Maduras the property and petitioned for rezoning ember 1979. Sh has not been a paying proposition and has e property up sale and could not handle any major :improvements at this time. Also, she had doubts that they would be open next year. Mayor Bacon asked Mrs. Maduras if she sold the property right away, to be sure and notify the new owners of the ordinance req Jim Hawkins made a motion that Mrs. Maduras be given to June 1, 1984 to Attorney' Camp stated that any business lice~se issued under these circumstances uld be conditional and marked accordingly on the license. Max Bacon seconded the mot on which carried 6-0. " Anti ue Roy or 1959 by Bill for a funeral home. M firming that it had Hawk:ins made a mot io rezoning in 1957 or Jim Tolleson seconded the - : Don' s Auto Sales Cochran Floor 843' Concord three parcels, stated this property was' zoned in at the same time he had his adjacent property rezoned. asked':i:f he could obtain a letter from Mr. Sanders con- ned, and the date and Mr. Roberson said he could. Jim Roberson be given 30 days to produce proof of the if so, these businesses would also be grandfathered. motion which carried 6-0. Bill's Barber Sho 821 Concord Road sent, but Mayor Bacon said he had accepted, a letter old h:im :it would not be necessary for him to appear hat Mr. Eidson was the owner of these two, lots and the same location since 1957 and ths gun shop for agreed, to acknowledge receipt of Mr. Eidson's letter ify him by letter that although he may not technically be made to comply we wold appreciate it if he could make necessary improvements. Mr. said that t tion our Code of' it will be necessary esses that were grandfathered were rezoned prior to adop- ce in JUly, 1977. In order to make these people comply, to write a "sundown" ordinance. Meeting adjourned at 8:10 p.m. , .,